Want Keith at your convention, or to speak at your university or arts college? Email keef@kchronicles.com for more info
Newest supporters:
*Ryan in Knoxville
*Alicia in Baltimore
*Kristin in Underhill, VT
*Toni in Portland
*Scott in Salt Lake City
Is this the start of a new series on the benefits of breastfeeding? That would be awesome, Keef! There’s such a stigma, so odd when it’s the most natural, safe, cheap, healthful way to feed a baby.
Huh? Have you got a source for that figure? I *seriously* doubt it’s correct. Formula’s expensive, but I don’t think it’s $1500 a year worth of expensive (especially when you consider that many mothers work during the first year and that means breastfeeding also comes with some expenses – breast pump, milk storage bags).
Dr. Sarah, check out this cool Baby Cost Calculator, it has a modest estimate for formula ($105/mo vs. the $130-150 I’ve seen elsewhere). That’s $1260 for the low priced formula alone. No bottles, sterilizers, etc. If you do the math for a breast pump, with all the trimmings, and nursing bra, pillow, etc. it gives a total of just under $500 (which seems about right in my experience). http://www.babycenter.com/baby-cost-calculator And that doesn’t include the alleged improved health/fewer doc visits/fewer long term health issues of breastfed babies!
I appreciate your effort to draw attention to the stigma on public breastfeeding but I don’t think that your approach is helpful. A price tag of $1500 implies that a woman’s time not breastfeeding is worthless when in fact many women might have to quit jobs, take unpaid leave, stop their community work or their care of relatives in order to be the exclusive meal for a baby. Yes, breastfeeding a baby is important but the real costs are too high for many women so it is definitely not worth it for many. This is an issue which government needs to address by providing real job protection, maternity leave, elderly care and breastfeeding support. Your comments single out mothers as those responsible and in control of saving this money and the baby as entitled to this so-called savings for her college fund. If America were serious about the welfare of its next generation than the whole concept of a college fund would be redundant anyways.
I’ve never understood why so many mothers are encouraged to bottle feed rather than breast feed their children.
What to they think those bumps on their chest are really for?
(13 votes, average: 4.77 out of 5)
Loading ...
Is that just the cost of formula for a year? Or does it include the reduction in doctors visits/medicine, too?
Your lactating breast zone sign is genius.
I assume you know about Nestle’s relevant abuses in Africa?…
Is this the start of a new series on the benefits of breastfeeding? That would be awesome, Keef! There’s such a stigma, so odd when it’s the most natural, safe, cheap, healthful way to feed a baby.
It’s totally weird. But ain’t that America? A man with tits in public is perfectly fine, but a woman..
I did a series of breast-feeding cartoons for the Knight Life in December. Check ‘em out here:
http://www.knightlifecomic.com/2010/12/06/miracle-of-breastfeeding/
THANKS! Love those!
Huh? Have you got a source for that figure? I *seriously* doubt it’s correct. Formula’s expensive, but I don’t think it’s $1500 a year worth of expensive (especially when you consider that many mothers work during the first year and that means breastfeeding also comes with some expenses – breast pump, milk storage bags).
Dr. Sarah, check out this cool Baby Cost Calculator, it has a modest estimate for formula ($105/mo vs. the $130-150 I’ve seen elsewhere). That’s $1260 for the low priced formula alone. No bottles, sterilizers, etc. If you do the math for a breast pump, with all the trimmings, and nursing bra, pillow, etc. it gives a total of just under $500 (which seems about right in my experience). http://www.babycenter.com/baby-cost-calculator And that doesn’t include the alleged improved health/fewer doc visits/fewer long term health issues of breastfed babies!
@ Sarah..
The Surgeon General for one:
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/breastfeeding/factsheet.html
Just do a google search and you’ll find dozens of sources.
I appreciate your effort to draw attention to the stigma on public breastfeeding but I don’t think that your approach is helpful. A price tag of $1500 implies that a woman’s time not breastfeeding is worthless when in fact many women might have to quit jobs, take unpaid leave, stop their community work or their care of relatives in order to be the exclusive meal for a baby. Yes, breastfeeding a baby is important but the real costs are too high for many women so it is definitely not worth it for many. This is an issue which government needs to address by providing real job protection, maternity leave, elderly care and breastfeeding support. Your comments single out mothers as those responsible and in control of saving this money and the baby as entitled to this so-called savings for her college fund. If America were serious about the welfare of its next generation than the whole concept of a college fund would be redundant anyways.
I’ve never understood why so many mothers are encouraged to bottle feed rather than breast feed their children.
What to they think those bumps on their chest are really for?